|
Post by The Red Factions on Aug 28, 2005 14:32:25 GMT
Everything makes sense now, I was a bit surprised to see Dobby propose Bukharin. Regardless, while I do not consider him a genuine Marxist-Leninist, Bukharin is one of the main architects of the "Socialism-in-one-country" thesis and therefore, we should have something on him as well.
|
|
|
Post by Dobbyniania on Aug 28, 2005 17:47:25 GMT
Ah...I thought it was a typo of Bukharin. My apologies. heh no problem
|
|
|
Post by hydrarchia on Aug 30, 2005 12:33:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by The Red Factions on Sept 1, 2005 21:13:49 GMT
And as far as nationstates is concerned, I think the essay concerning "Francoist Thought" should be added .... some might discard it as bull but it's very interesting nevertheless.
|
|
|
Post by Star City on Sept 1, 2005 22:49:08 GMT
Well, I said Mussolini should be added, so you might as well add FascFrancoist Thought
|
|
|
Post by Blackbird on Sept 2, 2005 0:26:52 GMT
I disagree RF. NS political writings have no place in this library.
|
|
|
Post by The Red Factions on Sept 2, 2005 8:08:00 GMT
Hm, they already are included, like IFTA.
|
|
|
Post by Blackbird on Sept 2, 2005 16:41:41 GMT
I don't think we should be a forum to mirror PRP propaganda.
|
|
|
Post by Star City on Sept 2, 2005 19:42:11 GMT
Aren't all political writings propaganda? They all seek to explain their respective causes and gain supporters.
|
|
|
Post by hydrarchia on Sept 2, 2005 21:02:37 GMT
What justification is there for including the works of Hitler, Mussolini, and Franco in the Peoples Library?
|
|
|
Post by Blackbird on Sept 2, 2005 22:26:53 GMT
Aren't all political writings propaganda? They all seek to explain their respective causes and gain supporters. But "Francoist Thought" is an NS work of political propaganda, and I don't believe this is a place for such.
|
|
|
Post by Star City on Sept 2, 2005 23:22:50 GMT
Equally, Marxism is a real-life political theory, it's not applicable to NS.
|
|
|
Post by Star City on Sept 2, 2005 23:26:04 GMT
What justification is there for including the works of Hitler, Mussolini, and Franco in the Peoples Library? The real Franco didn't have any theories - We're referring to the best-known player ns.goobergunch.net/wiki/index.php/Francos_SpainI disagreed on including Hitler - his theories revolved around race and everyone knows who he is anyway. I proposed Mussolini because of Fascism's link to socialism, being an anti-capitalist party (early on).
|
|
|
Post by small green plants on Sept 3, 2005 23:38:53 GMT
I am aghast at this argument over which works should be included and which should not. A library is a repository of learning and there must be no censorship!
Works by the like of Hitler etc... (I resent even typing that name!) should be available to study
Knowledge is power Know thine enemy
|
|
Ketoprofen
Defence Forces
Ketoprofen - The Proletariat Coalition
Posts: 1,883
|
Post by Ketoprofen on Sept 5, 2005 15:18:27 GMT
Agreed. All types of work should be available for consultation ... do you have any suggestions Small Green Plants?
|
|